like, warnke’s piece postulates “girls who read are intelligent and wonderful and i hate them because they’re capable of seeing how awful and disappointing and full of shit i am”
and the response postulates that girls who read are intelligent and wonderful
that
is not a refutation
i don’t understand how anyone could get a different message from “you should date an illiterate girl”
i don’t understand why that response was written
gustice likes this
slick-bullshit likes this
cecinestpasungeek likes this
deathtowatermelons said:
idk, but _maybe_ it wasn’t meant to be a refutation? maybe it was just supposed to be restating the premise of the original, but in a more positive, inspirational-ish way? probably not, though. that’s just the only explanation i can come up with.
deathtowatermelons likes this
dollyfin likes this
robotbears posted this
